Charles Giampaolo: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

Apr 5 2019

As it appeared on Heavy

Charles “C.J.” Giampaolo, a survivor of the 2017 Route 91 Harvest Music Festival mass shooting in Las Vegas, has filed a lawsuit against his employer, alleging he was told to “suck it up” after revealing to his boss that he suffered from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).

According to court documents filed in the State of Connecticut Superior Court, the Torrington, Connecticut resident says he was belittled, demoted and had his commission cut while working at the Elevator Service Company, Inc., (ESCO) in Torrington. The lawsuit claims ESCO discriminated against Giampaolo “in the terms, conditions and privileges of his employment based on his disability,” and is seeking unspecified damages.

Here’s what you need to know about Giampaolo’s lawsuit.

1. Giampaolo’s Father-in-Law Was Killed and Two Other Family Members Were Injured in the Shooting

In his lawsuit, Giampaolo describes a horrific scene of events in which he, his wife Jessica, her parents, aunt, and cousins were all on the Las Vegas Strip enjoying the Route 91 Harvest Music Festival on October 1, 2017, until gunman Stephen Paddock opened fire on the crowd from a room on the 32nd floor of the Mandalay Bay Hotel and Resort. The crime was the worst shooting incident in U.S. history.

Giampaolo’s father-in-law, Kurt Von Tillow, was fatally shot during the massacre, which took the lives 57 other concert-goers and injured approximately 900 more. Giampaolo quickly used his body as a human shield to protect his family during the shooting. Giampaolo’s discovered his wife’s aunt and one of her cousins was also shot but neither had life-threatening injuries.

With three wounded family members, Giampaolo and his wife used a phone charger and belt to try and staunch the bleeding, quickly moved the wounded to a safer spot under some bleachers, and “cowered underneath until the shooting finally stopped.” After a 10-month investigation, the FBI was unable to determine Paddock’s reason for the shooting.

2. Giampaolo Informed his Employers he Suffered From PTSD

Giampaolo returned to work three weeks after the shooting, but according to court documents, started experiencing what he described as “panic attacks, claustrophobia, sleeplessness and anxiety.” After seeing a therapist, Giampaolo was diagnosed with PTSD.

Giampaolo noticed a change in how he was treated at ESCO after he attended a crowded work-related function with hundreds of guests, loud music and strobe lights. He recalls that “his palms sweated, his heart rate escalated, and he felt as if the wall were closing in.” Giampaolo says the event was fun and exciting for everyone else but terrifying for him. Giampaolo told his employers, Steven and Linda Roth, that he was having a panic attack, and then he “ran for the door.”

3. Giampaolo Once Viewed his Boss as a “Father Figure”

Hired by ESCO in 2015 to execute elevator maintenance and repair contracts, Giampaolo quickly moved up the ranks. He was promoted to Account Executive within six months and became ESCO’s Sales Manager by March 2017. His duties were extensive and included sales as well as recruiting, hiring and managing team members. The lawsuit contends that Giampaolo’s stellar salesmanship and team management resulted in the company’s 30% revenue increase.

Giampaolo described his relationship with the Roths prior the shooting as being “akin to that of a family member,” and said he viewed Steven Roth as a “father figure,” revealing plans to devote the rest of his career to working for their company.


4. Management Told him he Had a “Bad Attitude” and “Entitled Vibe”

Although Giampaolo grappled with PTSD after the shooting, legal documents claim “he did not miss a beat at work,” and continued to effectively lead his team and boost ESCO’s profits. But after notifying ESCO’s management that he suffered from PTSD, Giampaolo felt that his treatment at the company continued to deteriorate. According to Giampaolo, Steven and Linda Roth criticized him for having a “bad attitude” and supervisors and colleagues alike treated him like “damaged goods.”

Giampaolo maintains that even though he had informed management and colleagues that he needed to attend regular therapy sessions after the shooting, and scheduled his appointments as late in the day as possible, they would “roll their eyes and comment: ‘You are leaving already?’” the lawsuit also mentions that Samantha Waldt, ESCO’s Customer Service Manager and Roth’s daughter, sent a text message to a mutual friend several weeks after the the business event, saying that Giampaolo was “walking around with an entitled vibe/God complex.”

5. Giampaolo Claims his Boss Accused him of Having a “Personality Disorder””

On April 10, 2018, Giampaolo met with Steve Roth, wanting an explanation for having his commission slashed a second time. On the following day, Giampaolo also met with ESCO’s other owners Linda Roth and Paul Farnsworth and claims he was berated for his “terrible attitude” and “lack of focus.” Court documents state that during the tense meeting, Linda Roth “bragged” about coming into work while being treated for cancer, told him she “sucked it up,” and he should do the same. It was during this meeting that Giampaolo left his job at ESCO. Court papers indicate his PTSD symptoms worsened after his departure and that he experienced “heightened anxiety, increased hyper-arousal and insomnia.”

Since leaving ESCO Giampaolo has found another job in sales and continues to seek treatment for PTSD. “It has been very up and down for Charles,” Giampaolo’s attorney Amanda DeMatteis was quoted as saying to the Connecticut Law Tribune. “He has been through unimaginable carnage in Las Vegas and tried to come back and find that sense of normalcy in his life, only to have it taken from him. It was traumatic in a different way, but it was still traumatic.”

Share this Post

criminal defense

About the Author

Avatar

Garrison, Levin-Epstein, Fitzgerald & Pirrotti, P.C.

Learn More

You deserve justice. We are here to fight for you.

Let Us Review Your Case

We will respond to your message promptly. Although we will keep your message strictly confidential, please note that contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Client Experiences

During a very difficult employment situation, I was referred to Joe Garrison. Recognizing the volatile and time sensitive nature of my employment situation, Mr. Garrison met with me immediately (on the weekend no less). He listened to the details of my case, was able to think through possible creative solutions to offer the employer, and was responsive to my myriad of questions. He understood my concerns about litigation versus settlement, and he worked to find the best resolution possible. I am grateful to have had his support at a very difficult time. —J.C., New Haven, CT

Ethan Levin-Epstein represented me during a most painful and challenging crisis in my personal and professional life. Seeing me within 24 hours of being referred, his support and advocacy, wisdom and clarity not only resulted in a favorable negotiated outcome for me and for my family, but gave me peace of mind and the courage to recover. I am very grateful to have met Ethan and his team and would refer anyone in need to this haven. — C.L., Guilford, CT

You will never meet a more knowledgeable and compassionate professional than Steve Fitzgerald. My employment situation was very complex, and Attorney Fitzgerald kept me focused while remaining extremely adept and “thinking on his feet.” Should the need present itself again, I would never seek anyone else’s counsel regarding employment issues. I cannot recommend him highly enough. — J.R., New Haven, CT

Nina Pirrotti provided outstanding legal advice and was trustworthy, dependable, and responsive. From the start, I was confident that her knowledge and experience would obtain favorable results. On a more personal note, I enjoyed working with her and her staff and felt I was included in every part of the process. The dedication, concern, and interest in me as a client was greatly appreciated, and Nina has earned my highest recommendation. — J.H., Monroe, CT

I recently found myself in need of a lawyer in handling a dispute with my former employer. I was fortunate to retain Josh Goodbaum as my legal counsel. His legal skills knowledge and professionalism shone through in every step of the process resulting in a very positive result. I highly recommend Josh if you find yourself in need of legal counsel. — S.R., Guilford, CT

When I go to a lawyer for advice, I am usually anxious, particularly the first meeting. Amanda DeMatteis was clear in describing my options and immediately set me at ease. Realistic assessment is important, and Amanda was clear as to how to set up the case and the direction she felt we should go. I had total confidence in her abilities and knew I was being well represented against a large corporation. More importantly, we were successful! —N.M., Haddam, CT

Proven Results & Personalized Attention When You Need It Most

American Law Institute Super Lawyers American College of Trial Lawyers Best Lawyers The College of Labor and Employment Lawyers
Back to Top