AARP sues Yale over financial penalties in workplace wellness program

Jul 17 2019

As it appeared in

by Paige Minemyer

AARP has filed suit against Yale University, alleging its employee wellness program forces workers to reveal sensitive health information to the college and several vendors.

Employees who receive health benefits from Yale are automatically enrolled in Health Expectations but are given the opportunity to opt in or out on a quarterly basis.

Those who do not participate in required screening test or choose to opt out of the program pay a $25 per week fee—or $1,300 for a whole year.

Required screenings include cholesterol and lipid panels, diabetes testing and cervical and colon cancer tests, depending on the member’s age.

AARP said in the lawsuit, which was filed on behalf of several Yale employees, that the structure of the program is in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA), because revealing certain medical conditions could lead to discrimination based on health history.

About 5,000 workers are subject to the program, AARP said.

“This is a particularly important issue for older workers, who are more likely to have disabilities and medical conditions—such as diabetes, heart disease and cancer—that are at risk of being revealed by wellness questionnaires and exams,” AARP Foundation President Lisa Marsh Ryerson said in a statement.

“And it hits low-income workers the hardest. Allowing employers to financially coerce workers into relinquishing their personal health information is a clear violation of medical privacy and civil rights protections,” she said.

This isn’t the first time AARP has asked the courts to intervene in the design of workplace wellness programs. In 2017, the group won a suit challenging guidelines from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission that would allow employers to levy penalties for nonparticipation.

AARP’s suit challenging financial penalties comes as several recent studies throw cold water on the clinical benefits of workplace wellness programs. Employees want and expect these benefits, but many are not using them—and evidence that they’re improving health is scant, studies show.

For example, a study published in April in the Journal of the American Medical Association found self-reported health behaviors did not increase substantially among workers who had access to a wellness program when compared to employees that did not.

Employers are committed to these programs, however. A recent survey from the National Business Group on Health found that large employers intend to spend $3.6 million this year on wellness initiatives.

Share this Post

health plan garrison

About the Author

Garrison, Levin-Epstein, Fitzgerald & Pirrotti, P.C.

Advocating for Employees
since 1977

Best Lawyers

Let Us Review Your Case

    We will respond to your message promptly. Although we will keep your message strictly confidential, please note that contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship.

    Client Experiences

    During a very difficult employment situation, I was referred to Joe Garrison. Recognizing the volatile and time sensitive nature of my employment situation, Mr. Garrison met with me immediately (on the weekend no less). He listened to the details of my case, was able to think through possible creative solutions to offer the employer, and was responsive to my myriad of questions. He understood my concerns about litigation versus settlement, and he worked to find the best resolution possible. I am grateful to have had his support at a very difficult time. —J.C., New Haven, CT

    You will never meet a more knowledgeable and compassionate professional than Steve Fitzgerald. My employment situation was very complex, and Attorney Fitzgerald kept me focused while remaining extremely adept and “thinking on his feet.” Should the need present itself again, I would never seek anyone else’s counsel regarding employment issues. I cannot recommend him highly enough. — J.R., New Haven, CT

    Nina Pirrotti provided outstanding legal advice and was trustworthy, dependable, and responsive. From the start, I was confident that her knowledge and experience would obtain favorable results. On a more personal note, I enjoyed working with her and her staff and felt I was included in every part of the process. The dedication, concern, and interest in me as a client was greatly appreciated, and Nina has earned my highest recommendation. — J.H., Monroe, CT

    I recently found myself in need of a lawyer in handling a dispute with my former employer. I was fortunate to retain Josh Goodbaum as my legal counsel. His legal skills knowledge and professionalism shone through in every step of the process resulting in a very positive result. I highly recommend Josh if you find yourself in need of legal counsel. — S.R., Guilford, CT

    When I go to a lawyer for advice, I am usually anxious, particularly the first meeting. Amanda DeMatteis was clear in describing my options and immediately set me at ease. Realistic assessment is important, and Amanda was clear as to how to set up the case and the direction she felt we should go. I had total confidence in her abilities and knew I was being well represented against a large corporation. More importantly, we were successful! —N.M., Haddam, CT

    Advocating for Employees since 1977

    American Law Institute Super Lawyers American College of Trial Lawyers Best Lawyers The College of Labor and Employment Lawyers
    Back to Top
    (203) 815-1716