Polansky: Kisses and hugs were for jobs well done

Jan 27 2010

As it appeared in the Connecticut Post

By Frank Juliano, STAFF WRITER, CTPost.com

Published 12:52 am, Wednesday, January 27, 2010

MILFORD — An investigator hired by the school board found no conclusive evidence that former Superintendent Harvey B. Polansky intended to sexually harass two female principals.

Attorney Loren Lettick wrote in the conclusion to his 13-page report that Polansky, whose contract was bought out by the school board last week, lacks the sensitivity to tell whether his hugs and kisses make women uncomfortable.

The investigator makes no specific recommendation, but wrote that some disciplinary action against Polansky is warranted because of his status as a top-level supervisor and role model. The board on Thursday night agreed to pay Polansky about $125,000 in return for his resignation and promise not to sue.

The report, released Tuesday morning, quotes Polansky as admitting that he hugged and occasionally kissed female staff members, “in the spirit of a congratulatory `good job’ sentiment.” But a New Haven lawyer who represents the two women said that the report “is not the product of an independent investigation. It is also incomplete as it omits admissions made by Dr. Polansky as well as facts provided by other witnesses.”

The attorney, Nina Pirrotti, said that Lettick’s claim that her clients’ allegations are uncorroborated “is of no significance, given that sexual harassers rarely engage in such conduct when witnesses are present.”

Pirrotti declined to say whether the two principals intend to sue the Board of Education, but said they are “gratified” by the board’s response, “and its acknowledgment that the community has been `rightly outraged and dismayed.’”

The women are not named in Lettick’s report and the Connecticut Post is not identifying them because they are the alleged victims of sexual assault.

The first woman, who is in her first year as a principal after 15 as a teacher here, told the board’s investigator that she was not satisfied with Polansky’s apology. Besides promising that the behavior would never happen again, Polansky had agreed to make Assistant Superintendent R. Michael Cummings the principal’s supervisor.

The new principal said that it was important for her to set an example for her teenage daughter “to stand up to this kind of behavior.” Neither she nor the second woman, a principal here for three years, had confronted Polansky directly because they said they feared retaliation and that they lacked tenure.

The second principal said that she had taken a class at the University of Connecticut from Polansky and served with him on several committees without any problems.

She told Lettick that the superintendent had hugged her between 10 and 20 times before last June, but that she had “made nothing of it.”

But the principal said that three times last June Polansky had touched her buttocks, and at a party at his home to mark the end of the school year, he had kissed her on the lips.

The second complainant told the investigator that she decided to come forward partly because of rumors that Polansky had engaged in sexually harassing behavior before.

Lettick investigated three of those alleged incidents, including one where the superintendent supposedly exposed his genitals to a female school board member. He determined, after interviewing both parties and a witness, that the superintendent was in a rest room when the woman opened the door, and that his fly was not open.

But Lettick did get confirmation of the report that Polansky had put a flower in another board member’s bosom. That woman told the investigator that she was offended by the superintendent’s sophomoric prank.

A former Southington school board attorney told Lettick that Polansky handled correctly a sex assault complaint against a coach while he was superintendent there.

An intern at UConn’s school of education told Lettick that in 120 hours of “shadowing” Polansky he had seen the former superintendent hug men and women, and heard people refer to him as “Uncle Harvey.”

Polansky’s attorney, Fred Dorsey, was not available for comment Tuesday.

 

 

Share this Post

Garrison Law

About the Author

Garrison, Levin-Epstein, Fitzgerald & Pirrotti, P.C.

Advocating for Employees
since 1977

Best Lawyers

Let Us Review Your Case

    We will respond to your message promptly. Although we will keep your message strictly confidential, please note that contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship.

    Client Experiences

    You will never meet a more knowledgeable and compassionate professional than Steve Fitzgerald. My employment situation was very complex, and Attorney Fitzgerald kept me focused while remaining extremely adept and “thinking on his feet.” Should the need present itself again, I would never seek anyone else’s counsel regarding employment issues. I cannot recommend him highly enough. — J.R., New Haven, CT

    Nina Pirrotti provided outstanding legal advice and was trustworthy, dependable, and responsive. From the start, I was confident that her knowledge and experience would obtain favorable results. On a more personal note, I enjoyed working with her and her staff and felt I was included in every part of the process. The dedication, concern, and interest in me as a client was greatly appreciated, and Nina has earned my highest recommendation. — J.H., Monroe, CT

    Josh Goodbaum truly outperformed my expectations. He was calm and steadfast throughout the entire process. He is a great communicator. Together, we were able to lay out a plan that in the end, not only got myself the outcome I was hoping for, but undoubtedly saved me valuable time and money as well. I cannot thank Josh and his firm enough for coming through for me in this time of uncertainty and stress.  — D.T.

    When I go to a lawyer for advice, I am usually anxious, particularly the first meeting. Amanda DeMatteis was clear in describing my options and immediately set me at ease. Realistic assessment is important, and Amanda was clear as to how to set up the case and the direction she felt we should go. I had total confidence in her abilities and knew I was being well represented against a large corporation. More importantly, we were successful! — N.M., Haddam, CT

    Advocating for Employees since 1977

    American Law Institute Super Lawyers American College of Trial Lawyers Best Lawyers The College of Labor and Employment Lawyers
    Back to Top
    (203) 815-1716