What Protects Whistleblowers From Retaliation?

Jun 30 2021

Nina Pirrotti: Hey Steve.

Steve Fitzgerald: Hi Nina.

Nina Pirrotti: I understand that we’re talking about whistleblowers today and in particular, a couple of Connecticut statutes that protect whistleblowers. Maybe you should start by telling us, what is a whistleblower?

Steve Fitzgerald: Sure, a whistleblower is an employee who observes that their employer has engaged in illegal activity, suspected illegal activity, and he then reports that activity to a law enforcement or government agency.  In taking that step we say that the employee has quote-unquote, “blown the whistle” on their employer. So then, the employee has effectively blown the whistle on the wrongdoing on the part of their employer. Causes of action then arise for those employees if they are retaliated against for having blown the whistle on their employer.

Nina Pirrotti: What is the first statute that you wanted to talk about?

Steve Fitzgerald: Sure, so the first statute that I want to talk about is Connecticut General Statute Section number 31-51M. Now this statute protects, what we call here at Garrison, the “classic” whistleblowing scenario. That’s the one I just described where the employee, through his or her work, observes a violation of the law being conducted by his or her employer or again, a suspected violation of the law.  Those laws include state law, federal law, municipal ordinances.  And, that employee then goes to a government agency, whatever agency that may be, the department of revenue, the department of public health, in order to report to that relevant government agency the wrongdoing being committed by his or her employer. Now 31-51M describes that activity that I just described as protected activity and it prohibits your employer from retaliating against you, either discharge or discipline or some other form of adverse action.  The statute prohibits your employer from taking that adverse action against you for having engaged in that whistleblowing activity. 31-51M has a variety of remedies available to the employee who proves he was retaliated against, including even reinstatement, if that employee was terminated.

Nina Pirrotti: Great. So, 31-51M protects employees who make a report about their employer to a government agency. Is there any protection for employees who blow the whistle inside the workplace?

Steve Fitzgerald: Sure, and in this regard, Connecticut is very unique. We have another statute, Connecticut General Statute Section 31-51Q, which protects free speech within the workplace. Now the way the case law has developed in interpreting 31-51Q, if an employee within the workplace is speaking out on something called “a matter of public concern”, then that employee can have that activity within the workplace deemed as protected activity.  Section 31-51Q prohibits the employer from disciplining or discharging that employee for having spoken out within the workplace on that matter of public concern. So that’s 31-51Q. It has a whole host of remedies available to an employee who prevails, including even punitive damages.

Nina Pirrotti: It’s a really very strong protection for whistleblowers under Connecticut law and I think an important one for our employees. So, if you’ve blown the whistle on your employer for violations or suspected violations under the whistleblower statutes at our disposal or any other and you believe you have been retaliated against for doing so, please call us here at Garrison.

Share this Post

Steve Fitzgerald discussing whistleblower retaliation with Nina Pirrotti

About the Author

Garrison, Levin-Epstein, Fitzgerald & Pirrotti, P.C.

Advocating for Employees
since 1977

Best Lawyers

Let Us Review Your Case

    We will respond to your message promptly. Although we will keep your message strictly confidential, please note that contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship.

    Client Experiences

    During a very difficult employment situation, I was referred to Joe Garrison. Recognizing the volatile and time sensitive nature of my employment situation, Mr. Garrison met with me immediately (on the weekend no less). He listened to the details of my case, was able to think through possible creative solutions to offer the employer, and was responsive to my myriad of questions. He understood my concerns about litigation versus settlement, and he worked to find the best resolution possible. I am grateful to have had his support at a very difficult time. —J.C., New Haven, CT

    You will never meet a more knowledgeable and compassionate professional than Steve Fitzgerald. My employment situation was very complex, and Attorney Fitzgerald kept me focused while remaining extremely adept and “thinking on his feet.” Should the need present itself again, I would never seek anyone else’s counsel regarding employment issues. I cannot recommend him highly enough. — J.R., New Haven, CT

    Nina Pirrotti provided outstanding legal advice and was trustworthy, dependable, and responsive. From the start, I was confident that her knowledge and experience would obtain favorable results. On a more personal note, I enjoyed working with her and her staff and felt I was included in every part of the process. The dedication, concern, and interest in me as a client was greatly appreciated, and Nina has earned my highest recommendation. — J.H., Monroe, CT

    I recently found myself in need of a lawyer in handling a dispute with my former employer. I was fortunate to retain Josh Goodbaum as my legal counsel. His legal skills knowledge and professionalism shone through in every step of the process resulting in a very positive result. I highly recommend Josh if you find yourself in need of legal counsel. — S.R., Guilford, CT

    When I go to a lawyer for advice, I am usually anxious, particularly the first meeting. Amanda DeMatteis was clear in describing my options and immediately set me at ease. Realistic assessment is important, and Amanda was clear as to how to set up the case and the direction she felt we should go. I had total confidence in her abilities and knew I was being well represented against a large corporation. More importantly, we were successful! —N.M., Haddam, CT

    Advocating for Employees since 1977

    American Law Institute Super Lawyers American College of Trial Lawyers Best Lawyers The College of Labor and Employment Lawyers
    Back to Top
    (203) 815-1716