What Connecticut Employees Need to Know About COVID-19

Workers Say Yale’s Wellness Policy Violates Bias Laws

Mar 2 2020

As it appeared on Law360

By Kevin Stawicki

Law360 (March 2, 2020, 6:43 PM EST) — Yale University’s policy to slap $1,300 fines on workers who refuse to hand over medical and genetic information violates federal disability and genetic information laws, those workers told a Connecticut federal judge Monday in an attempt to score an early win in their suit.

A group of unionized Yale workers urged the judge to partially grant summary judgment on claims that the elite university’s “health expectations program” violates the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act.

By forcing roughly 5,000 union members to choose between forking over personal information and losing $25 weekly from their paycheck for opting out, Yale contravened requirements under the two laws that such disclosures in work settings be voluntary, the workers said.

“The civil rights laws’ ‘voluntary’ exception to the general prohibition on employers’ medical intrusions into employees’ lives does not permit financial penalties for noncompliance with a wellness program,” the workers said.

“An act is only truly ‘voluntary’ when it is free from coercion, divorced from financial considerations, and characterized by true freedom of choice,” the workers continued.

While the ADA doesn’t give a clear definition for “medical examinations” in the workplace — which cannot be demanded under the law — the workers said the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s enforcement guidance clarifies that any procedure that seeks information about one’s health constitutes a medical examination.

Karen Peart, a spokesperson for Yale, said in an emailed statement that the university’s wellness program was negotiated with the workers’ union and “aims to improve the health of union members and their families.”

“Yale is confident that the program complies with federal law,” Peart said.

The plaintiffs are three unionized Yale employees — Christine Turecek, a cook; Jason Schwartz, a locksmith; and Lisa Kwesell, a part-time service assistant. The lawsuit notes Kwesell makes about $25,600 per year, meaning the $1,300 fine would constitute a 5% pay cut.

The workers are represented by Garrison Levin-Epstein Fitzgerald & Pirrotti PC and the AARP Foundation, whose sibling organization, AARP, has challenged the idea of nonvoluntary wellness programs in court before.

A lawsuit AARP filed in October 2016 succeeded in invalidating EEOC regulations that let companies fine workers for keeping health information private.

“This is kind of a follow-up to that litigation,” Dara Smith, an AARP Foundation senior attorney, told Law360 in July. “It’s a suit to enforce what the law is now after the 2016 regulations were struck down.”

Counsel for the workers declined to comment.

The workers are represented by Joshua R. Goodbaum, Joseph D. Garrison and Elisabeth J. Lee of Garrison Levin-Epstein Fitzgerald & Pirrotti PC, and Dara S. Smith, Elizabeth Aniskevich and Daniel B. Kohrman of AARP Foundation Litigation.

Yale University is represented by Jonathan M. Freiman, Kim E. Rinehart and Richard Luedeman of Wiggin and Dana LLP.

The case is Lisa Kwesell et al. v. Yale University, case number 3:19-cv-10980, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut.

–Additional reporting by Emily Brill. Editing by Jack Karp.

Share this Post

yale wellness garrison law

You deserve justice. We are here to fight for you.

Let Us Review Your Case

We will respond to your message promptly. Although we will keep your message strictly confidential, please note that contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Client Experiences

During a very difficult employment situation, I was referred to Joe Garrison. Recognizing the volatile and time sensitive nature of my employment situation, Mr. Garrison met with me immediately (on the weekend no less). He listened to the details of my case, was able to think through possible creative solutions to offer the employer, and was responsive to my myriad of questions. He understood my concerns about litigation versus settlement, and he worked to find the best resolution possible. I am grateful to have had his support at a very difficult time. —J.C., New Haven, CT

Ethan Levin-Epstein represented me during a most painful and challenging crisis in my personal and professional life. Seeing me within 24 hours of being referred, his support and advocacy, wisdom and clarity not only resulted in a favorable negotiated outcome for me and for my family, but gave me peace of mind and the courage to recover. I am very grateful to have met Ethan and his team and would refer anyone in need to this haven. — C.L., Guilford, CT

You will never meet a more knowledgeable and compassionate professional than Steve Fitzgerald. My employment situation was very complex, and Attorney Fitzgerald kept me focused while remaining extremely adept and “thinking on his feet.” Should the need present itself again, I would never seek anyone else’s counsel regarding employment issues. I cannot recommend him highly enough. — J.R., New Haven, CT

Nina Pirrotti provided outstanding legal advice and was trustworthy, dependable, and responsive. From the start, I was confident that her knowledge and experience would obtain favorable results. On a more personal note, I enjoyed working with her and her staff and felt I was included in every part of the process. The dedication, concern, and interest in me as a client was greatly appreciated, and Nina has earned my highest recommendation. — J.H., Monroe, CT

I recently found myself in need of a lawyer in handling a dispute with my former employer. I was fortunate to retain Josh Goodbaum as my legal counsel. His legal skills knowledge and professionalism shone through in every step of the process resulting in a very positive result. I highly recommend Josh if you find yourself in need of legal counsel. — S.R., Guilford, CT

When I go to a lawyer for advice, I am usually anxious, particularly the first meeting. Amanda DeMatteis was clear in describing my options and immediately set me at ease. Realistic assessment is important, and Amanda was clear as to how to set up the case and the direction she felt we should go. I had total confidence in her abilities and knew I was being well represented against a large corporation. More importantly, we were successful! —N.M., Haddam, CT

Proven Results & Personalized Attention When You Need It Most

American Law Institute Super Lawyers American College of Trial Lawyers Best Lawyers The College of Labor and Employment Lawyers
Back to Top