Workers Sue Yale Over Wellness Program

Jul 16 2019

As it appeared on the AARP Foundation website

Employees forced to pick either privacy or penalties, AARP Foundation says

by Kenneth Terrell, AARP

As many as 5,400 workers at Yale University were forced to either share their private medical information with their employer or pay an expensive fine, according to a class action lawsuit AARP Foundation filed today on their behalf.

The lawsuit argues that by charging some employees $1,300 annually — $25 per week — if they do not to participate in the university’s workplace wellness program, Yale has violated both the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA). The two laws bar employers from getting medical or genetic information from their workers unless that information is provided voluntarily.

“This is a particularly important issue for older workers, who are more likely to have disabilities and medical conditions — such as diabetes, heart disease and cancer — that are at risk of being revealed by wellness questionnaires and exams,” said AARP Foundation President Lisa Marsh Ryerson, “and it hits low-income workers the hardest. Allowing employers to financially coerce workers into relinquishing their personal health information is a clear violation of medical privacy and civil rights protections.”

The risks that workplace wellness programs pose for older workers — who often face age discrimination because employers think their health care coverage will be costly — are a problem AARP has fought against for years. In August 2017, AARP successfully sued the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to overturn federal wellness rules that allowed employers to penalize workers who do not to participate in the companies’ wellness programs.

“Under federal law, disclosing medical and genetic information and test results in workplace wellness programs must be voluntary,” said William Alvarado Rivera, senior vice president of Litigation at AARP Foundation. “Workers should have the freedom to choose whether to divulge personal health information in the workplace, as Congress intended.”

According to the lawsuit — which AARP Foundation filed in conjunction with the Connecticut civil rights firm Garrison, Levin-Epstein, Fitzgerald & Pirrotti — Yale’s program, called Health Expectations Program (HEP), requires certain union employees to submit to extensive medical testing. This include mammograms, colonoscopies and screenings for diabetes, for example, with the university’s health care providers gaining access to the results. Workers who prefer to keep their health information private or abstain from such tests are automatically charged $25 per week.

This arrangement forces employees to make uncomfortable and expensive decisions. For example, Christine Turecek, 57, works as a cook at Yale, which reported total net assets of $32 billion in 2018. Even though she previously had a double mastectomy (breast removal) during her fight with cancer, the HEP still expected her to have mammograms — tests that were no longer relevant — to avoid the penalty. Turecek, who is one of the lead plaintiffs, said she had to have multiple conversations with the wellness program about the mammograms, discussions she says were “too invasive” and emotionally draining because she repeatedly had to revisit her experience with cancer, according to the lawsuit.

Lisa Kwesell, who is 56 years old and another lead plaintiff in the lawsuit, works part time as a service assistant at the university. She participates in the wellness program because she can’t afford to have $25 per week taken out of her $408 weekly take-home pay, the lawsuit says. “[Yale] want[s] me to eat healthy. I couldn’t afford to buy good produce or good meat” if charged the $25 week fine, she says in the lawsuit. “Another $1,300 [per year] out of my paycheck would really hurt me.”

“The weekly fine is a high price to pay for privacy and protection from discrimination,” the lawsuit says.

Share this Post

ADA Yale

About the Author

Garrison, Levin-Epstein, Fitzgerald & Pirrotti, P.C.

Advocating for Employees
since 1977

Best Lawyers

Let Us Review Your Case

    We will respond to your message promptly. Although we will keep your message strictly confidential, please note that contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship.

    Client Experiences

    During a very difficult employment situation, I was referred to Joe Garrison. Recognizing the volatile and time sensitive nature of my employment situation, Mr. Garrison met with me immediately (on the weekend no less). He listened to the details of my case, was able to think through possible creative solutions to offer the employer, and was responsive to my myriad of questions. He understood my concerns about litigation versus settlement, and he worked to find the best resolution possible. I am grateful to have had his support at a very difficult time. —J.C., New Haven, CT

    You will never meet a more knowledgeable and compassionate professional than Steve Fitzgerald. My employment situation was very complex, and Attorney Fitzgerald kept me focused while remaining extremely adept and “thinking on his feet.” Should the need present itself again, I would never seek anyone else’s counsel regarding employment issues. I cannot recommend him highly enough. — J.R., New Haven, CT

    Nina Pirrotti provided outstanding legal advice and was trustworthy, dependable, and responsive. From the start, I was confident that her knowledge and experience would obtain favorable results. On a more personal note, I enjoyed working with her and her staff and felt I was included in every part of the process. The dedication, concern, and interest in me as a client was greatly appreciated, and Nina has earned my highest recommendation. — J.H., Monroe, CT

    I recently found myself in need of a lawyer in handling a dispute with my former employer. I was fortunate to retain Josh Goodbaum as my legal counsel. His legal skills knowledge and professionalism shone through in every step of the process resulting in a very positive result. I highly recommend Josh if you find yourself in need of legal counsel. — S.R., Guilford, CT

    When I go to a lawyer for advice, I am usually anxious, particularly the first meeting. Amanda DeMatteis was clear in describing my options and immediately set me at ease. Realistic assessment is important, and Amanda was clear as to how to set up the case and the direction she felt we should go. I had total confidence in her abilities and knew I was being well represented against a large corporation. More importantly, we were successful! —N.M., Haddam, CT

    Advocating for Employees since 1977

    American Law Institute Super Lawyers American College of Trial Lawyers Best Lawyers The College of Labor and Employment Lawyers
    Back to Top
    (203) 815-1716