Nina Pirrotti Featured on an Episode of “From Lawyer to Employer” to Discuss Employer Practices that Lead to Liability

Apr 15 2025

View the podcast transcript here

Garrison Law Partner Nina Pirrotti was recently featured on the latest episode of “From Lawyer to Employer,” a Shipman & Goodwin LLP podcast. Here, she joined host Daniel Schwartz to discuss where employers often go wrong—from inconsistently enforced policies and botched investigations to poorly trained supervisors and missteps in handling accommodations—and how to do better.  She dubbed the episode: Don’t Let This Happen to You!

Nina shared that if an employee is terminated from their job for a supposed policy violation, the employer should ensure they are enforcing those policies for everyone, stating, “Are [these policies] consistently applied across the board regardless of whether you are in a protected class or engaged in protected activity or not? And if so, great, and if not, you make that decision to disproportionately discipline our client at your peril.”

These policies should also apply to everyone regardless of their rank within a company. She recounts a time when a Fortune 500 company fired one of its top “rainmakers” after he engaged in sexual harassment with a subordinate, noting that, “All you need to do is one time, follow a policy to the letter when it comes to a rainmaker or a really important person in your company to send a message loud and clear – this is not tolerated, and if you do this kind of conduct, this is what happens to you. We don’t care who you are, whether you’re the person at the top of the food chain or at the bottom.”

She emphasizes the importance of following policies, not just having them in place, as “policies are only as good as the paper they are written on, and if you are not following your policies, you are really doing your company a tremendous disservice.”

She also discussed that it is essential to conduct thorough, thoughtful investigations in which the person bringing forth claims is treated in a respectful manner.  Ms. Pirrotti observed:

They start with interviewing the client and doing it in a way, Dan, that makes sure that the client feels safe and heard and not have the proverbial white light in the room. So, the question isn’t, why didn’t you bring this up to us sooner? The question is, help me understand, how it is that we’re here today. Can you walk me through that please?

I can’t tell you how often people come to me and say, I tried to share my cell phone with them. They said I’m not interested; where I tried to direct them to these three individuals and then we find out from these three individuals, no, no one ever got in touch with me. So, it’s following through there on speaking with witnesses, on reviewing documents, on making credibility assessments.

Just because it’s, “he said, she said,” you don’t throw up your hands and say, oh can’t do anything. You evaluate who has the motive to lie? What are the facts that we know about in the periphery are consistent with what she is saying. Does she appear in demeanor, in words and actions to be sincere and what she’s bringing forth.

In her discussion about the importance of proper sexual harassment training, Ms. Pirrotti stated that even where supervisors are well-meaning, they can open the employer up to liability if they are not properly trained:

So, supervisors need to receive even a heightened level of training on how to address workplace issues, because once the supervisor is on notice, the employer begins to face liability, and that’s where the danger lies. So, the training has to not only elevate about what constitutes unlawful discrimination or harassment, but what the supervisor must do about it once it is on notice of it.

Ms. Pirrotti provided examples of a poorly trained supervisor who gave an employee the wrong advice about her rights and responsibilities after she complained about sexual assault, and another example of one who immediately gave the employee a separation package and tried to rush her out the door after she complained about sexual harassment.  Both cases resulted in substantial settlements even though the supervisor did not intend to harm the employee.

Ms. Pirrotti also discussed the hallmarks of effective training about discrimination and harassment in the workplace.

Finally, Ms. Pirrotti weighed in on disability discrimination and FMLA interference and retaliation cases, how they differ, and the employer’s responsibility with respect to both.

To learn more, listen to the full episode here.

Nina Pirrotti is a partner at Garrison Law who focuses her practice on representing individuals in employment and civil rights litigation and negotiation. She is well-versed in all aspects of employment law, including discrimination, sexual harassment, wrongful termination, retaliation, contract disputes, FMLA, wage violations, severance agreements, and whistleblower claims. She also advocates on behalf of students and faculty who have had their rights violated.

Dan Schwartz is a partner at Shipman & Goodwin LLP who focuses his practice on litigation in a variety of areas, including employment discrimination, FMLA, retaliation, whistleblowing, and more.

Share this Post

About the Author

Garrison, Levin-Epstein, Fitzgerald & Pirrotti, P.C.

Advocating for Employees
since 1977

Best Lawyers

Let Us Review Your Case

    We will respond to your message promptly. Although we will keep your message strictly confidential, please note that contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship.

    Client Experiences

    You will never meet a more knowledgeable and compassionate professional than Steve Fitzgerald. My employment situation was very complex, and Attorney Fitzgerald kept me focused while remaining extremely adept and “thinking on his feet.” Should the need present itself again, I would never seek anyone else’s counsel regarding employment issues. I cannot recommend him highly enough. — J.R., New Haven, CT

    Nina Pirrotti provided outstanding legal advice and was trustworthy, dependable, and responsive. From the start, I was confident that her knowledge and experience would obtain favorable results. On a more personal note, I enjoyed working with her and her staff and felt I was included in every part of the process. The dedication, concern, and interest in me as a client was greatly appreciated, and Nina has earned my highest recommendation. — J.H., Monroe, CT

    Josh Goodbaum truly outperformed my expectations. He was calm and steadfast throughout the entire process. He is a great communicator. Together, we were able to lay out a plan that in the end, not only got myself the outcome I was hoping for, but undoubtedly saved me valuable time and money as well. I cannot thank Josh and his firm enough for coming through for me in this time of uncertainty and stress.  — D.T.

    When I go to a lawyer for advice, I am usually anxious, particularly the first meeting. Amanda DeMatteis was clear in describing my options and immediately set me at ease. Realistic assessment is important, and Amanda was clear as to how to set up the case and the direction she felt we should go. I had total confidence in her abilities and knew I was being well represented against a large corporation. More importantly, we were successful! — N.M., Haddam, CT

    Advocating for Employees since 1977

    American Law Institute Super Lawyers American College of Trial Lawyers Best Lawyers The College of Labor and Employment Lawyers
    Back to Top
    (203) 815-1716